Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Cisco's stolen code

• Previous message: tcleary2_at_csc.com.au: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Cisco's stolen code"
• In reply to: Ron DuFresne: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Cisco's stolen code"
• Reply: Ron DuFresne: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Cisco's stolen code"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

To: Ron DuFresne <dufresne@winternet.com>, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:54:03 -0700

<big snip>
>
> But, for realities sake, let's avoid hypothetical's and deal with the
> facts;
>
> The code was stolen, it's been widely announced that it was obtained from
> non-legal channels. Now, back to my question;
>
> how is this different from cquiring stolen property in any other context?
>
> Thanks,
>
Ron,

My point was strictly an ethical one on doing an audit, and the application of Fair Use in such. As I've tried to point out several times, the acquisition was a separate issue that I'm not going into. I'll let you pursue that with others.

Cheers,
L4J

>
> Ron DuFresne
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
> eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
> business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
> ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
>
> OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

• Previous message: tcleary2_at_csc.com.au: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Cisco's stolen code"
• In reply to: Ron DuFresne: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Cisco's stolen code"
• Reply: Ron DuFresne: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Cisco's stolen code"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]