RE: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco's stolen code
From: Ron DuFresne (dufresne_at_winternet.com)
To: "Ng, Kenneth (US)" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 14:41:53 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ng, Kenneth (US) wrote:
> Brian: I will give you another good reason to not go near the stolen code.
> If you EVER want to work on any project that is even remotely related to
> routers, or routing or anything else that Cisco equipment can do, you can
> not have touched any of the stolen code, or your code will be suspect.
> (Your accounting package has queues? Cisco IOS has queues (I assume), you
> must have copied it.) Even if your writing the code entirely from scratch,
> because you have seen the stolen code, you may be suspect. Is it unfair?
> Definitely. But this is why the GNU people emphasize staying away from any
> licensed source code.
Well except all that code stoen from SCO <grin>...
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.