Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSL compliant IRCd's?
From: Thilo Schulz (arny_at_ats.s.bawue.de)
Date: 05/25/04
- Previous message: Gregh: "[Full-Disclosure] Odd packet?"
- In reply to: Dave Howe: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSL compliant IRCd's?"
- Next in thread: Jorrit Kronjee: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSL compliant IRCd's?"
- Reply: Jorrit Kronjee: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSL compliant IRCd's?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 15:23:10 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 13:26, Dave Howe wrote:
> XChat does ssl just fine - I just don't know of any IRCd with the support
> compiled in.
There is a IRCd that supports it natively, although there are many people, who
argue that this IRCd is a bit lame and the choice of script kiddies.
Anyways, you can still have a look at it under http://www.unrealircd.com
- --
Thilo Schulz
My public PGP key is available at http://home.bawue.de/~arny/public_key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAs0jGZx4hBtWQhl4RAm2oAJ9A9BlkzQpnorD6fDVstB873ZCCuACfXSd7
PASfzBc1NAS+jDtPPZ8QGVk=
=mVSl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Gregh: "[Full-Disclosure] Odd packet?"
- In reply to: Dave Howe: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSL compliant IRCd's?"
- Next in thread: Jorrit Kronjee: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSL compliant IRCd's?"
- Reply: Jorrit Kronjee: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSL compliant IRCd's?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
