Re: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat
From: madsaxon (madsaxon_at_direcway.com)
Date: 05/03/04
- Previous message: Shawn Cox: "[Full-Disclosure] Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why?"
- In reply to: Sebastian Krahmer: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat"
- Next in thread: Christian Fromme: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat"
- Reply: Christian Fromme: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat"
- Reply: John Sage: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 08:42:07 -0500
At 11:59 AM 5/3/2004 +0200, Sebastian Krahmer wrote:
>Nice, but moderation bites with full disclosure I think.
Not in this case. Kurt only moderates the noise. All
the code and advisories are there, from both F-D and
Bugtraq. I highly recommend it if you don't care to
wade through obnoxious flames and endless reiterations of the
same lame questions.
m5x
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Shawn Cox: "[Full-Disclosure] Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why?"
- In reply to: Sebastian Krahmer: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat"
- Next in thread: Christian Fromme: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat"
- Reply: Christian Fromme: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat"
- Reply: John Sage: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] morning_wood is really a blackhat"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]