Re: [Full-Disclosure] viruses being sent to list

Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 04/30/04

  • Next message: Starford, Christopher D.: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Top 15 Reasons Why Admins Use Security Scan ners" 
    To: john.lalla@cox.net
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:35:47 -0400

    On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:18:51 PDT, John Lalla <john.lalla@cox.net> said:
    > --8323584-424238335-1083266341=:2613
    > Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >
    > I have recieved two virus infected emails from this list in the last
    > week. Is it possible to have our list admin run clamav or amavis-new. I
    > can deal with them on my own, but list-wide screening seems fundamental.
    >
    > From: wflahr@yahoo.com
    > Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:03:23 -0400
    > Virus Name: W32/Bagle.z@MM
    > Infected Attachments: 00000070.EML, /00000070.EML, /00000070.EML/me3.jpeg, /0
    0000070.EML/Details.exe
    >
    > From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
    > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:17:21 -0400
    > Virus Name: W32/Bagle.aa@MM
    > Infected Attachments: 00000070.EML, /00000070.EML, /00000070.EML/Smoke.scr

    Thanks for including sufficient Received: lines to prove that the two items
    in question even actually passed through the list.

    If you're going to beat a dead horse, at least prove you know which equine
    corpse you are in the process of flogging....

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Starford, Christopher D.: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Top 15 Reasons Why Admins Use Security Scan ners"