Re: [Full-Disclosure] THCIISSLame exploit
From: Sebastian Krahmer (krahmer_at_suse.de)
To: Feher Tamas <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:22:12 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Feher Tamas wrote:
> >THC is a hacker group, not a cracker group.
> Publishing root exploit source code is free speech and is protected.
> Publishing the binary is VX-ing and is criminal. That is very clear.
Wheres the V in "exploit"? Its maybe EXing...
> BTW, AV software only alert on binaries. AV firm research labs refuse to
> investigate malware in source code format, even if you send them a
> sample of a brand new one.
> To share knowledge with security researchers does not require
> releasing binary executables, professional testers can compile the
> source code for themselves. Avoid releasing binaries and you will not
I doubt that. At least it probably doesnt apply to 100%. What for is
-- ~ ~ perl self.pl ~ $_='print"\$_=\47$_\47;eval"';eval ~ email@example.com - SuSE Security Team ~ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html