[Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00
From: Crist J. Clark (cristjc_at_comcast.net)
Date: 04/20/04
- Previous message: David Vincent: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Next in thread: David Vincent: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Maybe reply: David Vincent: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Reply: Dave D. Cawley: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Maybe reply: Compton, Rich: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Maybe reply: SturmM: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Reply: Michal Zalewski: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Reply: Exibar: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Reply: Michael Schaefer: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Reply: Chris McCulloh: "NISCC Vulnerability Advisory 236929: Vulnerability Issues in TCP (was Re: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00)"
- Reply: Gregory A. Gilliss: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Maybe reply: Jos Osborne: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:28:16 -0700
Does anyone know WTF they are trying to say in this AP article,
"Core Internet Technology Is Vulnerable,"
It sounds like they are talking about a sequence number guessing
attack on TCP BGP sessions? Sequence number prediction isn't really
a new attack, but the story says,
"Experts previously maintained such attacks could take between
four years and 142 years to succeed because they require guessing
a rotating number from roughly 4 billion possible combinations.
Watson said he can guess the proper number with as few as four
attempts, which can be accomplished within seconds."
Hmmm... Four attempts... And the story makes it sound like a
cross-platform attack, not a bug in a particular OS's ISN generation.
FUD or is there something here?
--
Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu
| cjclark@jhu.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: David Vincent: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Next in thread: David Vincent: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Maybe reply: David Vincent: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Reply: Dave D. Cawley: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Maybe reply: Compton, Rich: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Maybe reply: SturmM: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Reply: Michal Zalewski: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Reply: Exibar: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Reply: Michael Schaefer: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Reply: Chris McCulloh: "NISCC Vulnerability Advisory 236929: Vulnerability Issues in TCP (was Re: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00)"
- Reply: Gregory A. Gilliss: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Maybe reply: Jos Osborne: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Core Internet Vulnerable - News at 11:00"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|