Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011
From: Exibar (exibar_at_thelair.com)
Date: 04/14/04
- Previous message: Mandrake Linux Security Team: "[Full-Disclosure] MDKSA-2004:028 - Updated cvs packages fix remotely exploitable vulnerability"
- In reply to: Edward W. Ray: "[Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Next in thread: Curt Purdy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Reply: Curt Purdy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Reply: John Sage: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Reply: madsaxon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Reply: Edward W. Ray: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <support@mmicman.com>, <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:59:14 -0400
give me a freakin break people.... you guys complain when Microsoft doesn't
patch something, and now you're complaining when Microsoft patches
something.... I think that a lot of people just like to bash Microsoft for
any reason they can think of what's next, Microsoft bashing because they're
in Redmond, WA and you feel they should be in Texas somewhere?
Do the world a favor and hide behind your precious little *nix machines
and *think* that you're immune to patching and security holes while the "bad
guys" happily take over your systems, one by one....
sheesh.....sorry for the rant, but I DO feel better now :-) I'll get off
my soapbox now
Exibar
----- Original Message -----
From: "Edward W. Ray" <support@mmicman.com>
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:10 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14
vulnerabilities, MS04-011
>
> I use Linux, OpenBSD and Windows in my enterprise. Linux and OpenBSD use
> the "1 patch for 1 vulnerability" rule. Seems to me that MS is bunching
> their patches together in order to make it seem on the surface that
Windows
> has less patches than other Oses, therefore it is more secure. CIOs, take
> note.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Mandrake Linux Security Team: "[Full-Disclosure] MDKSA-2004:028 - Updated cvs packages fix remotely exploitable vulnerability"
- In reply to: Edward W. Ray: "[Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Next in thread: Curt Purdy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Reply: Curt Purdy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Reply: John Sage: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Reply: madsaxon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Reply: Edward W. Ray: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|