Re: [Full-Disclosure] 1 patch for 1 vulnerabiliy for Linux and BSD? gunna try and sell us a bridge now too?

From: John Sage (jsage_at_finchhaven.com)
Date: 04/14/04

  • Next message: Exibar: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011" 
    To: Exibar <exibar@thelair.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:17:48 -0700

    Nice try.

    On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 12:04:46PM -0400, Exibar wrote:

    > From: "Exibar" <exibar@thelair.com> To:
    > <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>, <support@mmicman.com> Subject:
    > [Full-Disclosure] 1 patch for 1 vulnerabiliy for Linux and BSD? gunna try and sell us a bridge now too?
    > Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004
    > 12:04:46 -0400
    >
    > Looks like Linux Math is just as bad as Microsoft math now huh?
    > What happened to one patch for one vulnerability? Looks like there
    > is 5 in this one......

    You will *not* see Debian or anyone else trying to spin this into
    "..oh we have 'way, 'way fewer vulns than Micro$oft does so we're
    'way, 'way better..."

    That's Micro$oft's motive, pure and simple, for releasing multiple
    patches in the fewest possible packages.

    Then in two months or six months some bullsh*t TCO study will say "Oh,
    look, Micro$oft has so, so few patches!!"

    feh..

    - John 

    -- 
10 print "Home"
20 print "Sweet"
30 goto 10
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
  • Next message: Exibar: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The new Microsoft math: 1 patch for 14 vulnerabilities, MS04-011"

    Relevant Pages
    • Quantcast