Re: [Full-Disclosure] FAT32 input > output = null?

From: Nico Golde (nion_at_gmx.net)
Date: 04/09/04

  • Next message: Aida Escriva-Sammer: "[Full-Disclosure] [ GLSA 200404-11 ] Multiple Vulnerabilities in pwlib" 
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 14:12:18 +0200

    Hallo chris,

    * chris <chris@defcon.org> [2004-04-09 13:38]:
    > >i don't understand your problem.
    > >i tried:
    > >[nico@golde:~] $ ls -al test
    > >-rw-r--r-- 1 nico users 6 2004-04-08 11:46 test
    > >[nico@golde:~] $ test>test
    > >[nico@golde:~] $ ls -al test
    > >-rw-r--r-- 1 nico users 0 2004-04-08 11:47 test
    > >
    > >but it is not wondering because you put the output of the first command
    > >in the file after the >. because you have not a real command and you
    > >have no real output you overwrite the file with an empty output stream
    > >and the file is 0 byte after it.
    > >haven't i understand your problem correctly?
    > >regards nico
    >
    > I don't really have a problem. The original poster tried this on a FAT32
    > system and asked if it was normal behavior. Another poster confirmed that
    > this was the case with NTFS and I was merely doing the same for ext3.

    ok sorry, i misunderstood.
    regards nico 

    -- 
Nico Golde                | nico@ngolde.de      | 310777820@ICQ | nion@gmx.net
http://www.ngolde.de      | GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.gpg
Fingerprint               | FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69  C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF 
vim -c   ":%s/^/WhfgTNabgureRIvzSUnpxreT-Tavba/|:%s/[R-T]/ /Ig|:normal ggVGg?"

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Aida Escriva-Sammer: "[Full-Disclosure] [ GLSA 200404-11 ] Multiple Vulnerabilities in pwlib"