Re: [Full-Disclosure] Wiretap or Magic Lantern?

From: Cael Abal (lists2_at_onryou.com)
Date: 04/07/04

  • Next message: Maarten: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Wiretap or Magic Lantern?"
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 10:01:49 -0400
    
    

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    | 2., The terrorsts are not stupid, they use strong encryption and there
    | is proof that PGP repels NSA.

    Hi Tamas,

    Although I agree with some of your post, I have to take exception to
    this point. What proof are you referring to? All conspiracy theories
    aside, it's silly to assume that the good guys have approximately the
    same levels of technology, knowledge and resources as the bad guys.

    Myself, I'll wait until I'm given a tour of the NSA's secret underground
    bunkers before I make any claims as to what the NSA can and cannot do. :)

    Cael

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)

    iD8DBQFAdAnNR2vQ2HfQHfsRAjvOAJ9hBAzHT4CYsJ+kYy1/CDx5rAQEWwCghjcw
    R3frpGXlvwhlSORC/jLJaTw=
    =hvt0
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  • Next message: Maarten: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Wiretap or Magic Lantern?"