Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [FD] FD should block attachments

From: Luke Norman (luke_at_normanonline.co.uk)
Date: 04/03/04

  • Next message: Schmehl, Paul L: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [FD] FD should block attachments" 
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 00:29:52 +0100

    >am i missing something here?
    > because i realy do not see the issue.
    >

    Yes, you are
    As far as I can see from the numerous postings on the list, the issue
    isn't really recieving virii or anything else, it's the wasted
    time/bandwidth etc etc that comes from attatchments, and the costs that
    places on users who pay by the minute or by the megabyte. I personally
    don't think attatchments should be stopped, but I believe that's the
    argument for their filtering?
    Luke

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Schmehl, Paul L: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [FD] FD should block attachments"

    Relevant Pages
    • Quantcast