RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)
From: Exibar (exibar_at_thelair.com)
Date: 03/30/04
- Previous message: Drew Copley: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Next in thread: Thor Larholm: "RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:47:46 -0500
How can this be a 0-day worm is McAfee VirusScan picks it up as VBS/Psyme
worm? In my opinion, in order to truely be a 0-day worm, it has to be
completely new. It doesn't even have to be a new vulnerability really.
0-day --> date of birth (no AV signatures out at first onset, larger AV
companies start releasing signatures after a couple hours of backwards
engineering)
1 - 3 Day ---> living the good life (Large AV vendors have sigs out,
smaller av vendors should have them out as well)
3+ Day ---> old.... (ALL AV vendors have sigs out)
Now, a 0-day vulnerabilty and a 0-day worm for the 0-day vuln, would be
something indeed. It surely would catch the world by surprise....
Psyme is not 0-day, McAfee had DATS out for it since October 8, last
year, discovered September 30 last year...
I'm not trying to start a flame war, thats just the way I see things.
Exibar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:53 PM
> To: Drew Copley
> Cc: Jelmer; full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com; bugtraq@securityfocus.com
> Subject: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit
> (was new worm)
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:44:12 PST, Drew Copley <dcopley@eeye.com> said:
>
> > Yeah. It is a zero day worm, and it is very notable as such.
> >
> > I can not recall a previous zero day worm. (AV is not my job, but I do
> > try and follow zero day.)
> >
> > Hence, IE has birthed us the first zero day worm.
>
> Has anybody offered the Microsoft dude who denied the existence of 0-days
> some ketchup for his fried crow? ;)
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Drew Copley: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Next in thread: Thor Larholm: "RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|