Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 03/30/04
- Previous message: Burton M. Strauss III: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: Addressing Cisco Security Issues"
- Maybe in reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Next in thread: Drew Copley: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Drew Copley <dcopley@eeye.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:26:56 -0500
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:14:12 PST, Drew Copley said:
>
> > Has anybody offered the Microsoft dude who denied the
> > existence of 0-days
> > some ketchup for his fried crow? ;)
>
> I do not recall this quote. Such a quote would be patently untrue even
> from the viewpoint of legitimate researchers that have open bugs with
> them. Such bugs are "zero day", though the vendor may be aware of them.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3485972.stm
Sad part was that the CTO for their security business and technology unit.
And yes, he was widely derided for it.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Burton M. Strauss III: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: Addressing Cisco Security Issues"
- Maybe in reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Next in thread: Drew Copley: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|