Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 03/30/04
- Previous message: Berend-Jan Wever: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- In reply to: Drew Copley: "RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Next in thread: Exibar: "RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Maybe reply: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Reply: Exibar: "RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Drew Copley <dcopley@eeye.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:52:42 -0500
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:44:12 PST, Drew Copley <dcopley@eeye.com> said:
> Yeah. It is a zero day worm, and it is very notable as such.
>
> I can not recall a previous zero day worm. (AV is not my job, but I do
> try and follow zero day.)
>
> Hence, IE has birthed us the first zero day worm.
Has anybody offered the Microsoft dude who denied the existence of 0-days
some ketchup for his fried crow? ;)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Berend-Jan Wever: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- In reply to: Drew Copley: "RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Next in thread: Exibar: "RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Maybe reply: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Reply: Exibar: "RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|