Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cronning Update Jobs
From: Remko Lodder (remko_at_elvandar.org)
Date: 03/28/04
- Previous message: Nico Golde: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cronning Update Jobs"
- In reply to: Nico Golde: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cronning Update Jobs"
- Next in thread: Tobias Weisserth: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cronning Update Jobs <- really a bad idea in Portage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:11:56 +0200
Hi nico,
Nico Golde wrote:
> Hallo Luke,
>
> * Luke Norman <luke@normanonline.co.uk> [2004-03-27 17:28]:
> [...]
>
>>My question is this - are there any security risks to adding this
>>command to a cron job, and having it execute say, once every 12 hours.
>>Any and all input appreciated
>
>
> is it a risk if you do it manually? see? ;-)
> regards nico
=> at least with a manual run you can see what happends, an automated
update goes without visual see-ing of what happends... So in that way
automated updates are a bigger risk in security then manual runs.
HTH,
Kind regards,
Remko Lodder
Elvandar.org/DSINet.org
www.mostly-harmless.nl A Dutch community for helping newcomers on the
hackerscene
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Nico Golde: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cronning Update Jobs"
- In reply to: Nico Golde: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cronning Update Jobs"
- Next in thread: Tobias Weisserth: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cronning Update Jobs <- really a bad idea in Portage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|