[Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME
From: martin f krafft (madduck_at_madduck.net)
Date: 02/29/04
- Previous message: Tobias Weisserth: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The Trillian GPL violation allegations are confirmed false."
- In reply to: gabriel rosenkoetter: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:32:12 +0100
also sprach gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net> [2004.02.28.2207 +0100]:
> This isn't the right place for this conversation. Either Perry
> Metzger's cryptography list or cypherpunks (if you can still find an
> active node) would be the right place.
cypherpunks-request@al-qaeda.net
-- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! will kill for oil!
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: Digital signature
- Previous message: Tobias Weisserth: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The Trillian GPL violation allegations are confirmed false."
- In reply to: gabriel rosenkoetter: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]