[Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME
From: gabriel rosenkoetter (gr_at_eclipsed.net)
Date: 02/28/04
- Previous message: Bill Royds: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Empty emails example"
- In reply to: Ben Nelson: "[Full-Disclosure] OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME"
- Next in thread: martin f krafft: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME"
- Reply: martin f krafft: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:07:54 -0500
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:23:42PM -0700, Ben Nelson wrote:
> I'd like to open a discussion about PGP vs. S/MIME .
That's lovely, but how does it pertain to the full disclosure of
system security problems?
This isn't the right place for this conversation. Either Perry
Metzger's cryptography list or cypherpunks (if you can still find an
active node) would be the right place.
-- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Bill Royds: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Empty emails example"
- In reply to: Ben Nelson: "[Full-Disclosure] OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME"
- Next in thread: martin f krafft: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME"
- Reply: martin f krafft: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]