Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Knocking Microsoft

From: Denis Dimick (denis_at_dimick.net)
Date: 02/28/04

  • Next message: gadgeteer_at_elegantinnovations.org: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME)"
    To: "James F. Wilkus" <james@unixninja.us>
    Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:13:25 -0800 (PST)
    
    

    Linux/Unix just has to be more sercure then Windows..;)

    Also as for lame admins.. Yes there are some when it comes to unix/Linux..
    However, when the base OS is more secure then Windows it's not as painful
    to the rest of us..

    -Denis

    On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, James F. Wilkus wrote:

    >
    > > and now they try to make it secure. UNIX was made to be secure, and
    > > now they are adding colours.
    >
    > This is not true. UNIX was not made to be secure. Any UNIX security
    > history book will tell you that.
    >
    > Just because you run UNIX does not make you immune to attacks. Linux,
    > with it's world domination kick, is recruiting more and more windows
    > admins to it's ranks. You think that these same windows, now linux,
    > admins are going to do a better job at securing their systems? These
    > same admins who can not apply patches before the next major worm
    > strikes?
    >
    > apt-get update is easy, so is clicking on windows update...
    >
    > I think people are doing a disservice by claiming that linux is
    > something it is not, or more accurately, generalizing all UNIX's to be
    > secure.
    >
    >

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  • Next message: gadgeteer_at_elegantinnovations.org: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Any Way to Run Windows 2000 From Read-Only CD?
      ... Your point regarding infecting the computer during runtime when the disk is ... Now, regarding UNIX versus Windows, I try to have a balanced view. ... administrator can isolate those and secure them. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.security)
    • Re: Unix vs. Windows Security
      ... and b) security will mean Internet security. ... There are some core issues at the heart of the UNIX vs. Windows security ... Neither were ever designed to be secure. ...
      (comp.security.misc)
    • Re: Determine if open(2) created or opened?
      ... > simple!= secure. ... that the source of many of Windows' problems can be attributed to it's ... This myth is exactly why the UNIX community is just sitting on their ... You can switch security contexts within a thread ...
      (comp.unix.programmer)
    • Re: Unix vs. Windows for Security
      ... maintain in a secure environment. ... security problems. ... > Unix is a multiuser operating system, so out of the box it is far from ... > don't have that multiuser shell ability on Windows you have on Unix. ...
      (comp.security.unix)
    • Re: Unix vs. Windows for Security
      ... > Unix is a multiuser operating system, so out of the box it is far from ... > Windows comes with nothing basically. ... So unless you take the proper steps to secure Unix it will be ...
      (comp.security.unix)

  • Quantcast