Re: [Full-Disclosure] Coming soon: CPU fix for buffer overflows

• Previous message: Larry Seltzer: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Windows XP explorer.exe heap overflow."
• In reply to: Marek Isalski: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Coming soon: CPU fix for buffer overflows"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:14:12 +0100

On Tuesday 24 February 2004 15:02, Marek Isalski wrote:
> >>>> Michael Williamson <michael@puffin.tamucc.edu> 24/02/2004 >13:30:15
> >>>> >>>
> >
> >On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 20:38, Mike Barushok wrote:

> Bad analogy time...
>
> A non-deterministic Turing Machine is a bit like having an infinite
> (?probably has to be countable) number of deterministic Turing Machines
> running in parallel. The 4004 can simulate that too, just not in 'real
> time'. Far from it! But it will get the answer eventually.

Well. That is not proven. If the expansion and subsequent predicted collapse
of the universe happens _sooner_ than that poor 4004 finishing its quantum
simulation answer, your theory does not fly. ;-))

Maarten

> Regards,
> Maz

-- 
Yes of course I'm sure it's the red cable. I guarante[^%!/+)F#0c|'NO CARRIER
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

• Previous message: Larry Seltzer: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Windows XP explorer.exe heap overflow."
• In reply to: Marek Isalski: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Coming soon: CPU fix for buffer overflows"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]