[Full-Disclosure] os x mass mailers

From: petard (petard_at_freeshell.org)
Date: 02/18/04

  • Next message: Replugge[ROD]: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Second critical mremap() bug found in all Linux kernels"
    To: Joshua Levitsky <jlevitsk@joshie.com>
    Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:59:50 +0000
    
    

    On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:09:54PM -0500, Joshua Levitsky wrote:
    > Personally I hope someone is writing an OS X virus / worm to shut those
    > people up about how secure the 3% using Macs are. How hard is it for someone
    > to write a freaking osascript that tell application Address Book.app ... and
    > then tell application Mail.app ... and you would have the same problems as
    > windows. It would be nice to have a little less stress with Windows and let
    > the others suffer for a while.

    the script to do so is trivial... certainly easier than on windows, I'd
    say. in fact, here's how to send a message with no user interaction at
    all in applescript, provided mail.app is running and authenticated to
    your server as required:

    tell application "Mail"
        set newMessage to make new outgoing message with properties
    {subject:"some witty subject", content:"some random garbage",
    sender:"some@loser.tld"}
        tell newMessage
            make new to recipient at end of to recipients with properties
    {name:"Victim", address:"victim@other.tld"}
            send
        end tell
    end tell

    The issue is getting that to propagate on a large scale. There are 3
    problems:
        1. Mail.app doesn't automatically execute incoming scripts.
        2. If you ship it as a "script" (even run-only) the only thing that
    happens when someone double-clicks it is that script editor opens; it
    doesn't run. Most mac users have never seen the script editor, wouldn't
    like it, and would promptly quit.
        3. If you ship it as an application bundle, mail presents a very
    dire warning about how you shouldn't open it because it may contain a
    virus or be harmful to your computer and does not default to opening it.

    Those 3 issues assume you've hit an os x user who runs mail.app. Other
    users just wouldn't be able to execute it if they want and are stupid
    enough to do so. And that's most of the recipient pool. (95% of the
    people in a non-technical user's address book are likely to be windows
    users. Not exactly fertile ground for an applescript virus.)

    The combination of more difficult social engineering thanks to a safer
    default configuration of the environment and a smaller user population
    make writing this mass mailing trojan very unrewarding. The upshot is
    that, as a practical matter, the 3% using Macs are much safer.

    And you must just be an ass if you hope for more of this crap to clog
    your mailbox, whether you use the platform in question or not. I haven't
    been vulnerable to a single one of them, but they irritate me and I
    certainly don't want more stuff like it bogging down my servers.

    regards,
    petard

    -- 
    If your message really might be confidential, download my PGP key here:
    http://petard.freeshell.org/petard.asc
    and encrypt it. Otherwise, save bandwidth and lose the disclaimer.
    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    

  • Next message: Replugge[ROD]: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Second critical mremap() bug found in all Linux kernels"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: spyware on macs ?
      ... Now, the Macs will have to connect with other Macs to spread the virus--the Windows boxes, on the other hand, can pretty much just pick an active address at random and get a viable target. ... Whatever virus they release will spread slowly, and attack a more difficult target in the process. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Macs in Astronomy Updated; Canon 20D under Mac & Windows
      ... > competitors in 2003 because of their total dependency on Windows while ... Any virus is unlikely to be ... If it were a Mac virus, the Macs would have been ... maintainability, and other concerns that might have bearing on security, ...
      (sci.astro.amateur)
    • Re: best antivirus solution for a Mac.
      ... and virus issues on our network. ... But can someone tell my why Macs account for just 3% of computers out there? ... > Use ClamAV for antivirus protection if you need it. ... > antivirus scanner available for many flavors of *NIX and Windows. ...
      (microsoft.public.macintosh.general)
    • Re: spyware on macs ?
      ... Thus, no viruses or spyware. ... The zeros are Windows boxes, the ones are Macs. ... Each victim you get will act as another carrier of the virus. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Bobax.C
      ... Other files containing the virus have been ... W32.Bobax.C is a worm that exploits both the LSASS ... While this threat may execute on Windows 95/98/Me/Server ... Virus Definitions * ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)