Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: W2K source "leaked"?
To: Allen/gore/SlackWareWolf <goreBOFH@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:11:36 -0500
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:06:41 EST, Allen/gore/SlackWareWolf said:
> I think they should release the source for NT anyway. They
> are pretty much dropping it, and they say it is so badly
> made they can hardly fix it, well, why not let the REAL
> hackers out there who can make an OS, take a look at it.
> Maybe they are a little nervouse? Maybe people would see it
> was badly made? Wither way I know ALOT of people who STILL
> swear by NT. With proper skill, NT can be made hard. 2,000
> is similar, and I think it would be great if they finally
> said "Ok, fine, here is the source".
They can't do that because of the truly astounding overlap between
the NT codebase and the Win200/XP codebase. Think MS04-07, and
ask if they can afford to have NT code out there.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored