[Full-Disclosure] Re: Funny, I thought I mailed FULL DISCLOSURE

From: gabriel rosenkoetter (gr_at_eclipsed.net)
Date: 02/12/04

  • Next message: gabriel rosenkoetter: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: HELLO"
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:48:43 -0500

    Um. You did. But you also mailed Bugtraq and patchmanagement, one
    of which (I really can't be bothered to decipher which for you;
    those headers are a mess) is what rejected your post:

    On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 06:39:31PM -0800, morning_wood wrote:
    > >Subject: Message rejected
    > > List-Id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
    > > To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>, <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>,
    > > <patchmanagement@listserv.patchmanagement.org>,
    > > <dotsecure@hushmail.com>

    I think maybe you need to be tall enough to use your MUA before you
    start whinging about bounces that even poorly configured MTAs send
    back to you...

    gabriel rosenkoetter

    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: gabriel rosenkoetter: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: HELLO"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Wheres the FAQ n Charter?
      ... In article, Simon Caldwell writes ... decipher the headers and suggest where we should report Mr Oldfield's ... Dominic Sexton ...
    • Re: virus emails
      ... > Can I determine the origin of these by reading ... I have tried to decipher but it seems to ... scanned our mail server and it comes up clean. ... Without seeing the headers all anybody can do is guess at the problem. ...