[Full-Disclosure] Re: Funny, I thought I mailed FULL DISCLOSURE
From: gabriel rosenkoetter (gr_at_eclipsed.net)
Date: 02/12/04
- Previous message: Martin: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] HELLO"
- In reply to: morning_wood: "[Full-Disclosure] Funny, I thought I mailed FULL DISCLOSURE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:48:43 -0500
Um. You did. But you also mailed Bugtraq and patchmanagement, one
of which (I really can't be bothered to decipher which for you;
those headers are a mess) is what rejected your post:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 06:39:31PM -0800, morning_wood wrote:
> >Subject: Message rejected
[...]
> > List-Id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
> > To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>, <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > <patchmanagement@listserv.patchmanagement.org>,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > <dotsecure@hushmail.com>
I think maybe you need to be tall enough to use your MUA before you
start whinging about bounces that even poorly configured MTAs send
back to you...
-- gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Martin: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] HELLO"
- In reply to: morning_wood: "[Full-Disclosure] Funny, I thought I mailed FULL DISCLOSURE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
