Re: [Full-Disclosure] sco.com Press Release
From: Nick FitzGerald (nick_at_virus-l.demon.co.uk)
Date: 02/03/04
- Previous message: Thierry: "Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] Sample of Mydoom A & B"
- In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] sco.com Press Release"
- Next in thread: Kenton Smith: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] sco.com Press Release"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 00:09:27 +1300
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> This would be true if MyDoom showed any really creative innovation, like
> abusing a as-yet-generally-unknown 0day, or some novel approach to finding
> ways into a system.
>
> If I was looking for holes, I'd pass on the MyDoom author and find out
> what Lie Die Yu was doing - the kind of thinking that went into the
> "Sis Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack" is what you want on your side.
Agree on both counts.
Mydoom -- like nearly all viruses -- is totally lame on the innovation
front and (if the stories are to be believed) Microsoft must rue the
day it stoped supporting Lie Die Yu...
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Thierry: "Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] Sample of Mydoom A & B"
- In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] sco.com Press Release"
- Next in thread: Kenton Smith: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] sco.com Press Release"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]