RE: Fw: [Full-Disclosure] [TOTALLY OT] Google fun
From: Rikard Gothäll (rikard_at_nada.kth.se)
Date: 01/30/04
- Previous message: Thomas Zangl - Mobil: "Re:[Full-Disclosure] Scam or SPAM ? : a trojan is on your computer!"
- In reply to: madsaxon: "Re: Fw: [Full-Disclosure] [TOTALLY OT] Google fun"
- Next in thread: Nico Golde: "Re: Fw: [Full-Disclosure] [TOTALLY OT] Google fun"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:44:42 +0100
> One of the ways Google determines ranking is by how many
> links exist to a given site or object. If you convince a
> number of people to provide a link from the word "bastards"
> pointing to www.sco.com, Google assumes it's a popular site
> for that topic and ranks it accordingly.
Actually those sites linking must also have a high rank in order to raise the
rank of the page they point to. A cluster of pages linking to eachother and one
more site will yield a very low rank unless some high ranking site links into
the cluster.
The google design is quite clever.
/rikard
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Thomas Zangl - Mobil: "Re:[Full-Disclosure] Scam or SPAM ? : a trojan is on your computer!"
- In reply to: madsaxon: "Re: Fw: [Full-Disclosure] [TOTALLY OT] Google fun"
- Next in thread: Nico Golde: "Re: Fw: [Full-Disclosure] [TOTALLY OT] Google fun"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]