RE: [Full-Disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 g ot fatal signal 11

• Previous message: Mike Shaw: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] 45% of the free files collected via KaZaA contained malware"
• Maybe in reply to: John.Airey_at_rnib.org.uk: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 g ot fatal signal 11"
• Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 g ot fatal signal 11"
• Reply: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 g ot fatal signal 11"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:13:26 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Schreiner [mailto:ks@ub.uni-mainz.de]
> Sent: 09 January 2004 08:43
> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
> Cc: guninski@guninski.com; full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error:
> program cc1
> got fatal signal 11
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> > 3) This is why it *will* segfault at runtime. If it
> *fails* to segfault at runtime,
> > you have a *very* weird system indeed (or possibly very
> weird compiler flags ;)
>
> just tried this on solaris9/sparc:
> >-349: uname -a
> SunOS sb1001 5.9 Generic_112233-05 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
>
> using:
> >-333: gcc -v
> Reading specs from
> /opt/nb/gcc-3.3/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2/3.3/specs
> Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/opt/nb/gcc-3.3
> --host=sparc-sun-solaris2
> --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc,ada --enable-shared
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.3
>
> >-339: cat gcc-muell.c
> int main(void)
> {
> printf("%c","msux"[0xcafebabe]);
> }
>
> >-340: gcc gcc-muell.c
> [Compiles w/o compaints!]

Guys, this is getting to be a peeing contest. Can anyone confirm that the
gcc maintainers are aware of this, and are they able to make a statement as
to which compilers need their optimisation code sorted?

I mean, if we did this kind of gross dissection of every bug, we'd be
deleting messages all day and not doing any work. Full-disclosure doesn't
mean full-boredom!

To be specific:

1. Feel free to report a bug
2. Wait for a fix or provide one yourself.
3. Go back to 1 if 2 doesn't fix it.

Thank you.

-
John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 John.Airey@rnib.org.uk

Even if you win the rat race, that will still only make you a rat.

-
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

• Previous message: Mike Shaw: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] 45% of the free files collected via KaZaA contained malware"
• Maybe in reply to: John.Airey_at_rnib.org.uk: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 g ot fatal signal 11"
• Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 g ot fatal signal 11"
• Reply: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 g ot fatal signal 11"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]