RE: [Full-Disclosure] 3 new MS patches next week... but none fix

From: Randal, Phil (prandal_at_herefordshire.gov.uk)
Date: 01/09/04

  • Next message: Georgi Guninski: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11" 
    To: "'Exibar'" <exibar@thelair.com>, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:18:46 -0000

    Time for me to get on my soapbox too.

    What are the three patches, what's your source of information, and do they
    fix things readers of this list need to know about?

    Less gossip, more information, please.

    Cheers,

    Phil

    ---------------------------------------------
    Phil Randal
    Network Engineer
    Herefordshire Council
    Hereford, UK

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
    > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com]On Behalf Of Exibar
    > Sent: 08 January 2004 19:16
    > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] 3 new MS patches next week... but none fix
    > 0x01!
    >
    >
    > What's going on over at Microsoft anyway? They're releasing
    > 3 new patches
    > next week, but are planned to take care of the "0x01"
    > vulnerability in IE.
    > I'm one of Microsoft's defenders, and I'm starting to get a little
    > confused and upset at what they're doing.
    >
    > Heck if 3rd parties can write a fix for the darned thing,
    > why the heck
    > can't Microsoft???? What are they thinking over there?
    >
    > oh, I guess they are waiting for a large client to get
    > scammed by a scam
    > e-mail and then wait for that client to complain. Money
    > really does talk I
    > guess.... it's a shame
    >
    > <sigh>
    >
    > I'm off my soapbox now, we now return you to your regularly
    > scheduled
    > program.
    >
    > Exibar
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    >

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Georgi Guninski: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Q824143 -- how to get patch?!?
      ... There are 2 sorts of patches. ... client or clients that are have an issue. ... They are available from product support if the engineer while working with ... the client identifies that this fix will fix the specific problem the client ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • Re: Q824143 -- how to get patch?!?
      ... > There are 2 sorts of patches. ... > client or clients that are have an issue. ... > the client identifies that this fix will fix the specific problem the client ... > cases we then open a regular support incident with the appropriate cost that ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.13
      ... operations are performed using GIT commands and the patches are stored ... Safety checks for the 'rebase' command ... already modified by the current patch ... Fix bash completion to not garble the screen with an error message. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • 2.6.21-mm2
      ... A handful of IDE patches were dropped due to compilation failures. ... See the `hot-fixes' directory for any important updates to this patchset. ... If you hit a bug in -mm and it is not obvious which patch caused it, ... sunrpc fix ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • 2.6.17-mm4
      ... The RAID patches have been dropped due to testing failures in -mm3. ... The SCSI Attached Storage tree has been restored. ... See the `hot-fixes' directory for any important updates to this patchset. ... Fix reject due to git-agpgart.patch. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)