Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 01/08/04
- Previous message: Jeremiah Cornelius: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!"
- In reply to: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!"
- Next in thread: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!"
- Reply: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: nick@virus-l.demon.co.uk Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:55:15 -0500
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 16:06:29 +1300, Nick FitzGerald <nick@virus-l.demon.co.uk> said:
> I think anyone who thinks they'll break into contemporary mainstream
> antivirus research (which is very heavily dependent on access to huge
> repositories of malware samples) by side-stepping such issues is
> severely deluding themselves...
"Research" isn't what you're doing when you're planning to figure out how to
stop the *next* new attack by studying the terabytes of examples of how that
idea didn't stop the attack last time.
What you're doing there is milking a cash cow rather than finding a new way to
actually fix the problem right.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Jeremiah Cornelius: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!"
- In reply to: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!"
- Next in thread: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!"
- Reply: Nick FitzGerald: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]