Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Linux kernel do_mremap() proof-of-concept exploit code
From: Daniel B (dan_at_lockedbox.net)
Date: 01/06/04
- Previous message: Blue Boar: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Reverse Engineering thoughts"
- In reply to: Daniel Husand: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Linux kernel do_mremap() proof-of-concept exploit code"
- Next in thread: Luke Norman: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Linux kernel do_mremap() proof-of-concept exploit code"
- Reply: Luke Norman: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Linux kernel do_mremap() proof-of-concept exploit code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:20:59 +0000
Daniel Husand <io@naiv.us> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Christophe Devine wrote:
>
> | The following program can be used to test if a x86 Linux system
> | is vulnerable to the do_mremap() exploit; use at your own risk.
> |
> | $ cat mremap_poc.c
> |
>
> This didnt do anything on my 2.4.23-grsec kernel.
>
> - --
> Daniel
This froze my box running 2.6.0, was that the intention? (I think so..)
Regards,
Daniel.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Blue Boar: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Reverse Engineering thoughts"
- In reply to: Daniel Husand: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Linux kernel do_mremap() proof-of-concept exploit code"
- Next in thread: Luke Norman: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Linux kernel do_mremap() proof-of-concept exploit code"
- Reply: Luke Norman: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Linux kernel do_mremap() proof-of-concept exploit code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]