Re: [Full-Disclosure] weird worm ?
From: José María Mateos (chema_at_chema.homelinux.org)
Date: 12/31/03
- Previous message: William A. Carrel: "Re: Local Denial Of Service Attack Against Apple MacOS X, MacOS X Server, and Darwin."
- In reply to: Discini, Sonny: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] weird worm ?"
- Next in thread: Papp Geza: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] weird worm ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 19:12:51 +0100
El martes 30 de diciembre a las 16:11, Discini, Sonny escribió:
>Actually, by default, Symantec's SPAM filter will send a reply to the
>sender if an e-mail triggers a rule. This would be the success/failure
>reporting that you have mentioned.
I hope there's a way to disable that feature. It's really
braindead, you should *never* send a spammer a "there's someone
listening here" message.
Regards.
-- ** Blog Overflow: http://chema.homelinux.org ** No software patents in Europe http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es - EuropeSwPatentFree
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: Digital signature
- Previous message: William A. Carrel: "Re: Local Denial Of Service Attack Against Apple MacOS X, MacOS X Server, and Darwin."
- In reply to: Discini, Sonny: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] weird worm ?"
- Next in thread: Papp Geza: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] weird worm ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
