Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?
From: Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf_at_ghettot.org)
Date: 12/14/03
- Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?"
- In reply to: Michael Gale: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?"
- Next in thread: Michael Gale: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?"
- Reply: Michael Gale: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Michael Gale <michael@bluesuperman.com> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:24:55 +0100 (CET)
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Michael Gale wrote:
> Well then .. I am happy that non of the firewalls I use accept or pass
> fragments packets.
I would be willing to assume you are confused. Can you provide any
references that would confirm this observation?
--
------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
--------------------------- 2003-12-14 10:24 --
http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?"
- In reply to: Michael Gale: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?"
- Next in thread: Michael Gale: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?"
- Reply: Michael Gale: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]