Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing

Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 11/30/03

  • Next message: Jonathan A. Zdziarski: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing" 
    To: Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:20:36 -0500

    On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 05:55:52 PST, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> said:

    > So saying C is not secure is rather.. silly.

    I'm willing to assert that Unlambda is impossible to write an
    exploitable program:

    http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/madore/programs/unlambda/

    :)

    (Incidentally, if you're a language theory geek, there's a lot
    of really good stuff there - devising something worse than Intercal
    takes a LOT of theory background. :)

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Jonathan A. Zdziarski: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"