Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing
From: Michael Gale (michael_at_bluesuperman.com)
Date: 11/29/03
- Previous message: Bill Royds: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- In reply to: Bill Royds: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Next in thread: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Reply: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Reply: Gadi Evron: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:10:55 -0700
Oh.. I like this thread. I am not a programmer but would like to learn
and when I want to do something I want to be the best at it and do it
the right way.
The right being security first and reliability / speed second.
So C programming feels like a good challenge.
Michael.
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:11:02 -0500
"Bill Royds" <full-disclosure@royds.net> wrote:
> Only a good programmer can write safe C.
> Most programmers are not good programmers.
> Therefore most C code is not safe and should not be trusted.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Peter
> Moody Sent: November 29, 2003 12:52 PM
> To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing
>
> > your programmer must be perfect to guarantee security. C is best
> > used for low level programming where one needs to be close to the
> > hardware(programming in the small). It is not good for large
> > applications where modularity and flexibility are more important (
> > programming in the large).
>
> and for large applications where the programmer needs to be close to
> the hardware (programming in the?). like the 3.5 million lines of C
> code that comprise the linux kernel...
>
> I'm sick of lazy programmers who keep complaining how C doesn't hold
> your hand VB or some crap. The language does not the coder make. A
> good programmer will be able to make lisp, C, smalltalk (etc. etc.) do
> what they need it to.
>
> --
> Peter Moody <peter@ucsc.edu>
> Information Security Administrator 831/459.5409
> Communications and Technology Services. UC, Santa Cruz.
> http://security.ucsc.edu/pgp/peter.moody.pub
> :wq
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Bill Royds: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- In reply to: Bill Royds: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Next in thread: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Reply: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Reply: Gadi Evron: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|