Re: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing
From: Todd Burroughs (todd_at_hostopia.com)
Date: 11/29/03
- Previous message: Choe.Sung Cont. PACAF CSS/SCHP: "[Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- In reply to: Choe.Sung Cont. PACAF CSS/SCHP: "[Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Next in thread: Bill Royds: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Choe.Sung Cont. PACAF CSS/SCHP" <Sung.Choe@hickam.af.mil> Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 06:47:34 -0500 (EST)
> Bill Royds wrote:
> > If you are truly interested in security, you won't use C as the
> programming
> > language.
Probably, the language is written in C...
Ultimately it's all machine language and we can hide things in "higher
level" languages but it comes down to the fact thet we end up playing
with pointers and we aren't very good at it ;-)
Todd Burroughs
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Choe.Sung Cont. PACAF CSS/SCHP: "[Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- In reply to: Choe.Sung Cont. PACAF CSS/SCHP: "[Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Next in thread: Bill Royds: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
