[Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing
fulldisclosure_at_freedomnames.co.uk
Date: 11/28/03
- Previous message: Patrick Doyle: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Wireless Security"
- Next in thread: Josh Daymont: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Maybe reply: Josh Daymont: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Reply: Bill Royds: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:55:57 +0000
Hey guys,
please excuse me for bringing this topic up again, but i was kinda disappointed
with the feedback from before...
i'd like some input from the programming community regarding thoughts on static
vulnerability analysis, not specifically on the products that are already out
there (kinda limited imho) but rather from a design perspective.
im interested in the kinds of functionality that is required, interface design,
configuration issues (saved configs etc..) and most importantly the types of
vulnerabilities people would be interested in scanning for.
If i could get some positive feedback it'd be much appreciated.
-DC
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Patrick Doyle: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Wireless Security"
- Next in thread: Josh Daymont: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Maybe reply: Josh Daymont: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Reply: Bill Royds: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] automated vulnerability testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
