Re: [Full-Disclosure] Attacks based on predictable process IDs??
From: Wojciech Purczynski (cliph_at_isec.pl)
Date: 11/28/03
- Previous message: Enno Rey: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MPLS Security"
- In reply to: Dirk Mueller: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Attacks based on predictable process IDs??"
- Next in thread: Luis Bruno: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Attacks based on predictable process IDs??"
- Reply: Luis Bruno: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Attacks based on predictable process IDs??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Dirk Mueller <dmuell@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:54:52 +0100 (CET)
> current linux kernels provide more than 15bit pids ( I think its 30 or
> 31bits). Not much more, but it makes it slightly more difficult.
Your "current" linux doesn't seem to be stable yet ;) I haven't seen pids
wider than 15 bits on any production system :)
Cheers,
wp
-- Wojciech Purczynski iSEC Security Research http://isec.pl/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Enno Rey: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MPLS Security"
- In reply to: Dirk Mueller: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Attacks based on predictable process IDs??"
- Next in thread: Luis Bruno: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Attacks based on predictable process IDs??"
- Reply: Luis Bruno: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Attacks based on predictable process IDs??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
