Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSH Exploit Request
To: Robert Davies <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:19:11 -0500
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:08:41 EST, Robert Davies <email@example.com> said:
> I am quite bothered out the ass by well paid admins that are too damn lazy
> to spend the few minutes it takes to repair a flawed service. Either start
> doing your job, or get the hell out of the way for those of us that want to
> do the job required properly!
Actually, the *original* problem was that the OP *wanted* to apply the patch
to fix a flawed service, but was prevented from doing so by a flawed policy.
Now tell me - would *you* install the patch anyhow, knowing that (possibly)
doing so without all the change-control paperwork being done correctly
would mean your ass would be canned and you'd be looking for another job?
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored