Re: [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better

From: Gadi Evron (ge_at_linuxbox.org)
Date: 11/13/03

  • Next message: dphull_at_ku.edu: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Funny article"
    Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:48:57 -0800
    
    

    > Can you explain what responsibility does m$ take for its crap? Just read
    > the m$ EULA again before using the word "responsibility". (having the
    > right to say "fsck bill" does not qualify as responsibility).
    >

    This post was *not* about Microsoft.

    > There are enough bugs in windoze, but haven't you heard the rumours that
    > a lot of propriatary os code has leaked?

    I heard *rumors*. Maybe they are true, maybe they aren't.
    You can buy the source if you are a company/EDU that develops/researches
    on/for Windows.

    China just got (paid for) an executable version too.
    >
    > georgi

    -- 
           Gadi Evron (i.e. ge),
           ge@linuxbox.org.
    The Trojan Horses Research mailing list - http://ecompute.org/th-list
    My resume (Hebrew) - http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/resume.rtf
    PGP key for ge@linuxbox.org -
    http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron.asc
    Note: this key is used mainly for files and attachments, I sign email 
    messages using:
    http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron_sign.asc
    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    

  • Next message: dphull_at_ku.edu: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Funny article"