Re: [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better

From: Gadi Evron (
Date: 11/13/03

  • Next message: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Funny article"
    Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:48:57 -0800

    > Can you explain what responsibility does m$ take for its crap? Just read
    > the m$ EULA again before using the word "responsibility". (having the
    > right to say "fsck bill" does not qualify as responsibility).

    This post was *not* about Microsoft.

    > There are enough bugs in windoze, but haven't you heard the rumours that
    > a lot of propriatary os code has leaked?

    I heard *rumors*. Maybe they are true, maybe they aren't.
    You can buy the source if you are a company/EDU that develops/researches
    on/for Windows.

    China just got (paid for) an executable version too.
    > georgi

           Gadi Evron (i.e. ge),
    The Trojan Horses Research mailing list -
    My resume (Hebrew) -
    PGP key for -
    Note: this key is used mainly for files and attachments, I sign email 
    messages using:
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.

  • Next message: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Funny article"