Re: [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better
From: Gadi Evron (ge_at_linuxbox.org)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:48:57 -0800
> Can you explain what responsibility does m$ take for its crap? Just read
> the m$ EULA again before using the word "responsibility". (having the
> right to say "fsck bill" does not qualify as responsibility).
This post was *not* about Microsoft.
> There are enough bugs in windoze, but haven't you heard the rumours that
> a lot of propriatary os code has leaked?
I heard *rumors*. Maybe they are true, maybe they aren't.
You can buy the source if you are a company/EDU that develops/researches
China just got (paid for) an executable version too.
-- Gadi Evron (i.e. ge), firstname.lastname@example.org. The Trojan Horses Research mailing list - http://ecompute.org/th-list My resume (Hebrew) - http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/resume.rtf PGP key for email@example.com - http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron.asc Note: this key is used mainly for files and attachments, I sign email messages using: http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron_sign.asc _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html