Re: [Full-Disclosure] [RHSA-2003:323-01] Updated Ethereal packages fix security issues

From: Charles E. Hill (chill_at_herber-hill.com)
Date: 11/11/03

  • Next message: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] IIS 5.0 random/fixed TCP/UDP ports"
    To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
    Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:56:56 -0800
    
    

    On Monday 10 November 2003 09:55, bugzilla@redhat.com wrote:
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Red Hat Security Advisory
    >
    > Synopsis: Updated Ethereal packages fix security issues
    > Advisory ID: RHSA-2003:323-01
    > Issue date: 2003-11-10
    > Updated on: 2003-11-10
    > Product: Red Hat Linux
    > Keywords: ethereal SOCKS buffer overflow
    > Cross references:
    > Obsoletes: RHSA-2003:203
    > CVE Names: CAN-2003-0925 CAN-2003-0926 CAN-2003-0927

    <snip>

    Hmmm... two copies of this floated across the list.

    One of them was listed as "GOOD, BUT UNTRUSTED" by my GPG setup, however the
    other was listed as "THIS SIGNATURE IS BAD". Anyone else get this this? Is
    this normal? I don't usually see red -- bad signatures -- on the warnings.

    -- 
    Charles E. Hill
    Technical Director
    Herber-Hill LLC
    http://www.herber-hill.com/
    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    

  • Next message: Frank Knobbe: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] IIS 5.0 random/fixed TCP/UDP ports"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Steve Mills and top posting
      ... I don't tend to snip ... each separate point should be a new ... > And my signature is separated from the rest of the post by the standard ... keep my sig in all the following posts, helps gets hits on the website, ...
      (rec.juggling)
    • Re: initialising a vector of strings...
      ... | // for type deduction: it returns a reference to an array of N chars. ... | a compile-time constant. ... It seems to me that the signature in the declaration ...
      (alt.comp.lang.learn.c-cpp)
    • Re: Hello everyone
      ... the body of your message and your signature. ... leave in some attributions as to who posted what and snip out ... Google are evil and are ruining usenet. ...
      (uk.rec.cars.modifications)
    • Re: Deluge!
      ... I'm not a fan of children's novels, but giving away the ending of any story ... in your signature is a very poor form of humour. ...
      (uk.transport.london)
    • Re: Hello everyone
      ... I'm guessing you're new to Usenet. ... It's a "secret" code that means that people who have set up their news client to do so don't have to see your signature. ... It's also a good idea to quote at least a bit of the message you are replying to, type your message under the quoted text, leave in some attributions as to who posted what and snip out parts of the thread that aren't relevant. ...
      (uk.rec.cars.modifications)