RE: [Full-Disclosure] Proxies
From: S G Masood (sgmasood_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/31/03
- Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security"
- In reply to: Bassett, Mark: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Proxies"
- Next in thread: Jakob Lell: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Proxies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:58:28 -0800 (PST)
It is more or less impossible with current technology
to set up an automated system to *completely* prevent
users from accessing certain HTTP content. What I mean
here is that everything available can be bypassed.
How do you block *all* HTTP proxies, for instance(a la
Surfola and party)? How about custom written CGI
proxies? How about JAP like software?
> You could do a couple
> things to detect that people were using proxies
> though. Parse through
> your logs / ip accounting for repeated hits to hosts
> on port 80 and the
> source ip, have it email you those ips and
> investigate.
IMHO, these kind of measures are the only thing you
can do to enforce your content access policies.
-- S.G.Masood Hyderabad, India. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security"
- In reply to: Bassett, Mark: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Proxies"
- Next in thread: Jakob Lell: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Proxies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|