Re: [Full-Disclosure] Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 10/31/03
- Previous message: Robert Ahnemann: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security"
- In reply to: Stephen Blass: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security"
- Next in thread: Robert Ahnemann: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Stephen Blass <Stephen.Blass@asu.edu> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:47:31 -0500
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:21:56 MST, Stephen Blass <Stephen.Blass@asu.edu> said:
> > the fixes preceded the exploit.
>
> and pigs fly
From RFC1925:
(3) With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is
not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they
are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them
as they fly overhead.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Robert Ahnemann: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security"
- In reply to: Stephen Blass: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security"
- Next in thread: Robert Ahnemann: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]