Re: [Full-Disclosure] Coding securely, was Linux (in)security
From: Sebastian Herbst (pz_at_psychozapp.de)
Date: 10/29/03
- Previous message: Bassett, Mark: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] TinyURL"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul Schmehl: "[Full-Disclosure] Coding securely, was Linux (in)security"
- Next in thread: Bill Royds: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Coding securely, was Linux (in)security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:19:41 +0100
I just said "it is possible", i never said "it is a good idea" oder "it
is well worth the expenses".
But if you see open source software analogous to math, it would perhaps
make sense to do this with some smaller OS-independent libraries.
-- /~\ The ASCII Sebastian Herbst \ / Ribbon Campaign pz@psychozapp.de X Against HTML / \ Email! D90E 548A F4F9 5C1E 67E5 06A7 C426 3827 1568 206D
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Bassett, Mark: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] TinyURL"
- Maybe in reply to: Paul Schmehl: "[Full-Disclosure] Coding securely, was Linux (in)security"
- Next in thread: Bill Royds: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Coding securely, was Linux (in)security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
