RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Linux (in)security
From: Curt Purdy (purdy_at_tecman.com)
Date: 10/25/03
- Previous message: zero: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Trojan author revealed (was: Re: [Full-Disclosure] ProFTPD-1.2.9rc2 remote root exploit)"
- In reply to: Glenn_Everhart_at_bankone.com: "RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Linux (in)security"
- Next in thread: Bill Royds: "Re: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Linux (in)security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <Glenn_Everhart@bankone.com>, <lcamtuf@ghettot.org> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:44:26 -0500
> I agree that inherent OS features have much to do with their
> security, but must observe that OSs like VMS and OS/400 have
> very few security issues
<snip>
Agreed, I believe OS/400 may be the most secure out-of-the-box system out
there. But never underestimate a lousy vendor. My last audit was for a
HIPAA client that had all patient records on an AS/400. I thought I didn't
have a chance in heck of touching them. On the AS/400 side that was true,
with extremely granular access, allowing only certain users to certain data
that was unreachable otherwise.
However their main application happened to create a world readable/writeable
windows share of the records. I simply plugged my laptop into an empty wall
socket, browsed the ip network (not even logged into anything) and saw,
copied, and wrote to any record of my choosing. I was so shocked it took me
a few minutes to realize I just hit a grand slam.
Curt Purdy CISSP, GSEC, MCSE+I, CNE, CCDA
Information Security Engineer
DP Solutions
----------------------------------------
If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- White House cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/ms-tnef attachment: winmail.dat
- Previous message: zero: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Trojan author revealed (was: Re: [Full-Disclosure] ProFTPD-1.2.9rc2 remote root exploit)"
- In reply to: Glenn_Everhart_at_bankone.com: "RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Linux (in)security"
- Next in thread: Bill Royds: "Re: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Linux (in)security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|