Re: [Full-Disclosure] Teenager cleared of hacking - Off Topic?
From: Jonathan A. Zdziarski (jonathan_at_nuclearelephant.com)
Date: 10/17/03
- Previous message: John Sec: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSL Filtering"
- In reply to: Randal L. Schwartz: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Teenager cleared of hacking - Off Topic?"
- Next in thread: John.Airey_at_rnib.org.uk: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Teenager cleared of hacking - Off Topic?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:12:33 -0400
> John> I have to wonder how many companies do deals to employ hackers
> John> (like the movie "Catch me if you can").
>
> I know at least one company that doesn't.
There's a big difference between hiring a hacker to do a specific job,
and hiring someone then finding out he's hacking. I guess it also
depends on whether you are defining a 'hacker' as a criminal hacker or
expanding it to include professionals. Based on what I read at the URL
you provided, I would be very surprised if Intel hired a rogue criminal
hacker to test their security, but I can certainly see companies like
Intel hiring professional white-hat hackers or possibly x-"hackers" who
have learned their lesson to do the job.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: John Sec: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SSL Filtering"
- In reply to: Randal L. Schwartz: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Teenager cleared of hacking - Off Topic?"
- Next in thread: John.Airey_at_rnib.org.uk: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Teenager cleared of hacking - Off Topic?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|