RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Prudent default security
From: Steve Wray (steve.wray_at_paradise.net.nz)
Date: 09/30/03
- Previous message: Steven M. Christey: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Vendor non-acknowledgement"
- In reply to: Schmehl, Paul L: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Prudent default security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'Full Disclosure'" <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 08:16:20 +1200
Sigh, you are right.
On the one hand, as a Linux geek from way back,
I have a small sense of pride in my lack of MS knowledge.
But I use MS; XP is a great desktop, Outlook is a great
mail client (I also use a Linux desktop and kmail is a great
mail client).
So, on the other hand, I know that there are a lot of
*nix people out there who endlessly bash MS without
any knowledge of that which they curse. I don't want to
be one of those.
When the ignorant ask honest questions, don't
get abusive, just answer them... Please?
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of
> > From: Steve Wray [mailto:steve.wray@paradise.net.nz]
> >
> > I know that there are some nice tools for doing remote and
> bulk admin
> > for the latest iterations of the Windows operating system,
> > but from what I've seen, they lack maturity and often cause
> > more trouble than they help prevent (DCOM? Am I right? Does
> > anyone leave remote registry on?)
> >
> Steve, you should stop now. Your embarassing lack of knowledge of
> Windows is all too obvious.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Steven M. Christey: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Vendor non-acknowledgement"
- In reply to: Schmehl, Paul L: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Prudent default security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]