Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer
From: madsaxon (madsaxon_at_direcway.com)
Date: 09/30/03
- Previous message: Michael Smith: "RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly"
- In reply to: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Next in thread: Nexus: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Reply: Nexus: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Keith W. McCammon" <keith-list@mccammon.org> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:11:47 -0500
At 01:42 PM 9/30/03 -0400, Keith W. McCammon wrote:
>It would be nice if the clowns at @stake responsible for this would
>just take themselves quietly out of the loop, in the same manner as was
>done to someone else...
Agreed. Has anyone asked Dan for his take, I wonder?
m5x
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Michael Smith: "RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly"
- In reply to: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Next in thread: Nexus: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Reply: Nexus: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|