Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer

From: madsaxon (madsaxon_at_direcway.com)
Date: 09/30/03

  • Next message: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer" 
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:44:28 -0500

    At 12:32 PM 9/30/03 -0400, Keith W. McCammon wrote:
    >A corporate entity is just a collection of individuals. And in this case,
    >those individuals have (it seems) a great deal of influence within that
    >entity. Thus, for the purposes of this argument, the two can be treated
    >almost interchangeably.

    OK, let me phrase it a different way. I know some of the people
    involved, even at the higher levels of the corporation, who
    don't share in the official @Stake stance. In the same way
    that I don't necessarily blame Microsoft's employees for the
    decisions of Gates, et al., I don't want to see everyone at @Stake
    automatically crucified for this unfortunate action.

    m5x

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"