Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer
From: madsaxon (madsaxon_at_direcway.com)
Date: 09/30/03
- Previous message: OpenPKG: "[Full-Disclosure] Subject: [OpenPKG-SA-2003.044] OpenPKG Security Advisory (openssl)"
- In reply to: Georgi Guninski: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly"
- Next in thread: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Reply: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Reply: Stormwalker: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:31:29 -0500
At 10:18 AM 9/30/03 -0400, Stormwalker wrote:
>The following quotes clarify @Stake's position. It's worse than even I
>thought. They know better, but don't care anymore. M$ is more important
>than truth.
Perhaps. I caution you, however, to make a distinction between
@Stake as a corporate entity and some of the individual employees
thereof.
m5x
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: OpenPKG: "[Full-Disclosure] Subject: [OpenPKG-SA-2003.044] OpenPKG Security Advisory (openssl)"
- In reply to: Georgi Guninski: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly"
- Next in thread: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Reply: Keith W. McCammon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Reply: Stormwalker: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
