Re: [Full-Disclosure] The U.S. State Department needs "DCOMbobulator"
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 09/24/03
- Previous message: EnGarde Secure Linux: "[Full-Disclosure] [ESA-20030924-026] 'WebTool-userpass' passphrase disclosure vulnerability."
- In reply to: Richard M. Smith: "[Full-Disclosure] The U.S. State Department needs "DCOMbobulator""
- Next in thread: Guido van Rooij: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The U.S. State Department needs "DCOMbobulator""
- Reply: Guido van Rooij: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The U.S. State Department needs "DCOMbobulator""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Richard M. Smith" <rms@computerbytesman.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:48:01 -0400
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:12:12 EDT, "Richard M. Smith" <rms@computerbytesman.com> said:
> For most Windows users, I bet that the only time DCOM ever gets used, if
> at all, is to run worms like MSBlaster and Welchia.
Isn't DCOM needed for the WindowsUpdate stuff to work? Or am I misremembering?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: EnGarde Secure Linux: "[Full-Disclosure] [ESA-20030924-026] 'WebTool-userpass' passphrase disclosure vulnerability."
- In reply to: Richard M. Smith: "[Full-Disclosure] The U.S. State Department needs "DCOMbobulator""
- Next in thread: Guido van Rooij: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The U.S. State Department needs "DCOMbobulator""
- Reply: Guido van Rooij: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] The U.S. State Department needs "DCOMbobulator""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]