Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign "responds"
From: Jonathan A. Zdziarski (jonathan_at_nuclearelephant.com)
Date: 09/24/03
- Previous message: w g: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] FW: [Fwd: Re: AIM Password theft]"
- In reply to: Macroscape Solutions: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign "responds""
- Next in thread: Stormwalker: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign "responds""
- Reply: Stormwalker: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign "responds""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: lists@macroscape.com Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:26:20 -0400
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 21:25, Macroscape Solutions wrote:
> I think to be fare to Verisign and the other registrar's they at least
> should have links to GoDaddy and the likes to register the nonexistent
> domain. They should spread the wealth....if they won't suspend the service.
To be "fair" to everyone, the community should be in control of the
top-level domains, and not commercial organizations - nobody ever
expected the Internet to grow so huge (not even Al Gore). So initially
having a government-run agency was a good temporary solution, but now
that everything is commercialized, we need to fix what's broken...and
what's broken is the monopoly on TLDs.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: w g: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] FW: [Fwd: Re: AIM Password theft]"
- In reply to: Macroscape Solutions: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign "responds""
- Next in thread: Stormwalker: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign "responds""
- Reply: Stormwalker: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign "responds""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]